Shadow Mainnet Testing. Public deposits not yet open.See roadmap →
Arbitrum governance architecture live

Governance

Multyr operates under a four-entity governance architecture with separation of powers. All Safes are deployed and verified on-chain on Arbitrum.

Governance entities

ROOT_TIMELOCK

48h delay

0x295C...2798

Executes all governance actions after delay.

SAFE_GOV

3/5 multisig

0x70ef...a326

Owns all contracts and proposes parameter changes.

SAFE_GUARDIAN

1/1 multisig

0x7407...d677

Emergency-pause authority on pausable contracts. Cannot unpause.

SAFE_VETO

1/1 multisig

0xF0c1...f1D7

Cancels pending governance actions during timelock.

Capital Safes

Protocol capital is segregated by purpose. Treasury, Operations, and Safety Reserve do not share the same control path and do not hold user deposits.

Treasury Safe

Threshold: 3/5

0x75f6...1314

Protocol-owned capital. Will hold 75M MTRY at TGE. Receives a portion of protocol fees.

Operations Safe

Threshold: 2/3

0x80C7...EABc

Operational expenses only: development, infrastructure, audits, and partnerships. Refilled from Treasury through governance proposal.

Safety Reserve Safe

Threshold: 2/3

0x8c85...4f2B

Limited loss-absorption buffer funded from protocol fees. Currently minimal during the shadow testing phase and not an insurance mechanism.

Governance flow

SAFE_GOV proposes->ROOT_TIMELOCK (48h delay)->Execution

SAFE_VETO can cancel during the delay window. SAFE_GUARDIAN can emergency-pause instantly, but resumption still requires the full governance flow.

Properties enforced on-chain

  • 48h timelock on all parameter changes
  • Separation of powers across propose, cancel, execute, and pause authority
  • Segregated capital paths across Treasury, Operations, and Safety Reserve
  • Exit paths preserved even if governance is paused
  • Safe signers, thresholds, and history verifiable on-chain

Stewardship

The Multyr Protocol operates under on-chain governance. Multyr Ltd coordinates development, security research, and protocol evolution, but it does not control user funds and does not have unilateral authority over protocol parameters.

Progressive decentralization

Governance is designed to evolve toward broader community participation over time. New mechanics and transitions will still move through the same timelock-gated governance framework described above.